Eye on safety, California sets rules for self-driving cars
Photo: Google Self-Driving Car Project/ Google +
California regulators have unveiled a roadmap that would let consumers begin using self-driving cars, though manufacturers would have to prove the emerging technology is safe before a licensed driver could get chauffeured around town.
The approach California's Department of Motor Vehicles offered Wednesday in precedent-setting draft regulations is cautious, though it does allow that Californians could be behind the wheel of a self-driving car by 2017.
Among other safety-related requirements, the cars must have a steering wheel, and a licensed driver must be ready to take over if the machine fails.
Google, which is pushing to get cars without a steering wheel or pedals to consumers, expressed "grave disappointment" with the rules, which the tech giant said would slow deployment of technology with huge life-saving potential.
Though no manufacturer has said it thinks the cars are ready just yet, at least a dozen are developing the technology. Google has suggested a model could be ready for limited use sooner than the public expects. In September, the safety chief of its self-driving car project, Ron Medford, said the technology is "close to working pretty damn well."
California's go-slow approach could benefit Texas, which this summer emerged as a competitor in the deployment of self-driving cars when officials in the capital Austin welcomed Google prototypes for professional testing.
"Given the potential risks associated with deployment of such a new technology, DMV believes that manufacturers need to obtain more experience in testing driverless vehicles on public roads prior to making this technology available to the general public," the agency said in a written summary of its draft regulations.
Those draft rules set out how the DMV wants to move beyond the current small-scale testing of prototypes on public roads. The DMV can change the rules over the coming months before they are finalized, and the industry is sure to contest them as overly burdensome.
There are no comprehensive federal rules addressing the technology, and as the largest auto market in the U.S., rules in California are a landmark in the development of self-driving technology.
Under California's framework, Google couldn't sell a driverless car, even if it deems the car safe. Instead, manufacturers would receive a permit for three years, during which time consumers could lease the cars but manufacturers would be required to keep tabs on how safely they are driving and report that performance to the state.
Before the DMV grants that three-year permit, an independent certifier would need to verify a manufacturer's safety assurances. Drivers would need special, manufacturer-provided training, then get a special certification on their licenses.
If a car breaks the law, the driver would be responsible.
Though the timeline for public access is squishy, in principle the DMV could finalize the rules and a manufacturer could satisfy the safety requirements as early as 2017.
That said, the draft rules may also forestall the technology's public rollout.
"This points to a very long slog ahead for not just Google, but really other automakers as well — and probably some confirmation that developers of these technologies should be pivoting away from California," said Bryant Walker Smith, a law professor at the University of South Carolina who studies self-driving car regulation. "California's proposed rules are fantastic news for Texas."
Austin's mayoral spokesman Jason Stanford said his city's government believes self-driving cars are "legal and safe" already and that the city is "thrilled to host innovative ideas like this."
California has grappled for several years with how to regulate the technology. The DMV said it wanted regulations to protect public safety, but not be too onerous so that signature companies such as Google will be stifled in developing a technology that could prove safer than human drivers.
After all, cars that can safely drive themselves under all conditions wouldn't rely on drivers who may be drowsy, distracted, buzzed — or unable to drive because of their age or a disability. Boosters say the technology could prevent many of the more than 32,000 deaths on U.S. roads each year.
The cars use a suite of sensors — including radar, lasers and cameras — and onboard computers to drive. Many also rely on maps that detail everything from curb heights to the exact placement of lane stripes.
Eleven companies already have permission to test on California's public roads, with Ford the latest addition. There have been scattered collisions, nearly all involving Google cars. Those collisions have been minor and the tech giants says each has been caused by drivers of other cars.
Google spokesman Johnny Luu said the company was "gravely disappointed" by the draft regulations.
"Safety is our highest priority and primary motivator as we do this," he said in a written statement.
Meanwhile, a consumer group applauded the draft rules as appropriately cautious.
The DMV "did exactly what they should do, which is put the public safety first — and then take steps that promote the technology in a safe way," said John Simpson, privacy project director at Consumer Watchdog and frequent Google critic.
Though the result of more than a year of deliberation, the draft regulations must undergo months of review before they are set. The DMV intends to hold informal workshops for public input in January and February, and hopes — after making any changes — to publish final regulations later in 2016.
The DMV could then tackle regulations for cars with no driver inside.
___
Contact Justin Pritchard at http://twitter.com/lalanewsman.